Postgres vs. PostgreSQL

From: Peter Eisentraut <peter_e(at)gmx(dot)net>
To: pgsql-docs(at)postgresql(dot)org
Subject: Postgres vs. PostgreSQL
Date: 2000-04-09 18:33:40
Message-ID: Pine.LNX.4.21.0004091713200.375-100000@localhost.localdomain
Views: Raw Message | Whole Thread | Download mbox | Resend email
Thread:
Lists: pgsql-docs

Why is someone (presumably from southern California) always changing all
mentions of "PostgreSQL" in the documentation to "Postgres"? Wouldn't it
be more productive the other way around?

--
Peter Eisentraut Sernanders väg 10:115
peter_e(at)gmx(dot)net 75262 Uppsala
http://yi.org/peter-e/ Sweden

Responses

Browse pgsql-docs by date

  From Date Subject
Next Message Peter Eisentraut 2000-04-09 18:34:09 Re: Open documentation items for 7.0
Previous Message Bernard Frankpitt 2000-04-08 22:20:19 Re: [HACKERS] Doc updates