On Wed, 1 Mar 2000, The Hermit Hacker wrote:
> As Jeff mentioned earlier today, there is a poll going on at
> http://www.linux.com that asks:
> Several high-quality databases are available for Linux. Which database,
> if any, does your company primarily use with its Linux servers?
> Right now, PostgreSQL is lagging MySQL 21% to 48% ...
> Who hasn't voted? :) Get out there and make yourself heard, eh?
Yesterday I spent a few minutes trying to choose the DB to vote for. I
am using both Postgres and MySQL - different tasks require different
aproaches and solutions - and I am satisfied with both DBs. There are
niches for both of them.
Finally I voted for Postgres - just because MySQL already has its votes :)
Oleg Broytmann http://members.xoom.com/phd2/ phd2(at)earthling(dot)net
Programmers don't die, they just GOSUB without RETURN.
In response to
pgsql-announce by date
|Next:||From: R.L. Russell||Date: 2000-03-02 04:59:23|
|Subject: 1A - DATABASE SYSTEM ARCHITECT JOB|
|Previous:||From: Bruce Momjian||Date: 2000-03-01 04:20:17|
|Subject: Re: [HACKERS] Poll: Databases for Linux|
pgsql-hackers by date
|Next:||From: Karel Zak - Zakkr||Date: 2000-03-01 09:33:18|
|Subject: RE: [HACKERS] Cache query implemented|
|Previous:||From: Michael Meskes||Date: 2000-03-01 07:27:21|
|Subject: Re: [HACKERS] Compile woes|
pgsql-general by date
|Next:||From: Tomaz Borstnar||Date: 2000-03-01 11:23:05|
|Subject: Re: [GENERAL] psql 7.0.0 beta|
|Previous:||From: Oleg Broytmann||Date: 2000-03-01 09:18:19|
|Subject: Re: [GENERAL] order by|