Skip site navigation (1) Skip section navigation (2)

Re: [INTERFACES] JDBC compliancy question

From: Peter Mount <peter(at)retep(dot)org(dot)uk>
To: Mads Pultz <mpultz(at)get2net(dot)dk>
Cc: pgsql-interfaces(at)postgresql(dot)org
Subject: Re: [INTERFACES] JDBC compliancy question
Date: 1999-11-20 11:31:34
Message-ID: Pine.LNX.4.10.9911201128540.19044-100000@maidast.retep.org.uk (view raw or flat)
Thread:
Lists: pgsql-interfaces
On Sat, 20 Nov 1999, Mads Pultz wrote:

> Hi.
> 
> I've found plenty of mails concerning this question on this mailing-list and
> my conclusion was that the postgresql-6.5 JDBC drivers are (fully) JDBC
> complaint, JDBC 1.2 and 2. Why then does execution of method jdbcCompliant()
> return false? Is my conclusion wrong, is it not fully JDBCx compliant, if
> so what features are missing?

The driver is not compliant yet as we have a lot of MetaData methods to
implement.

I'm working at the moment on getting as many of these done for 7.0 (which
is why I'm quiet on the lists at the moment), but until we get everything
done, we can't set jdbcCompliant() to true.

Peter

--
       Peter T Mount peter(at)retep(dot)org(dot)uk
      Main Homepage: http://www.retep.org.uk
PostgreSQL JDBC Faq: http://www.retep.org.uk/postgres
 Java PDF Generator: http://www.retep.org.uk/pdf


In response to

pgsql-interfaces by date

Next:From: Lamar OwenDate: 1999-11-20 22:41:34
Subject: Re: [INTERFACES] pg_pwd
Previous:From: Tom LaneDate: 1999-11-20 06:26:35
Subject: Re: [INTERFACES] Front end memory consumption in SELECT

Privacy Policy | About PostgreSQL
Copyright © 1996-2014 The PostgreSQL Global Development Group