Re: CORBA again. (was: light dawns: serious bug in FE/BE protocol handling)

From: Taral <taral(at)taral(dot)net>
To: Goran Thyni <goran(at)kyla(dot)kiruna(dot)se>
Cc: Todd Graham Lewis <tlewis(at)mindspring(dot)net>, Tom Lane <tgl(at)sss(dot)pgh(dot)pa(dot)us>, pgsql-hackers(at)postgreSQL(dot)org
Subject: Re: CORBA again. (was: light dawns: serious bug in FE/BE protocol handling)
Date: 1999-04-26 18:06:37
Message-ID: Pine.LNX.4.10.9904261305340.9990-100000@dragon.taral.net
Views: Raw Message | Whole Thread | Download mbox | Resend email
Thread:
Lists: pgsql-hackers

On Mon, 26 Apr 1999, Goran Thyni wrote:

> Taral wrote:
> > mico 2.2.6 has sufficient services support for CORBA to proceed.
>
> I know some people thinks mico is great but I have some concerns:

We are explicitly designing the system to allow any CORBA 2.2
implementation with the C++ mapping supported to be used.

Taral

In response to

Responses

Browse pgsql-hackers by date

  From Date Subject
Next Message Taral 1999-04-26 18:14:04 Re: CORBA again. (was: light dawns: serious bug in FE/BE protocol handling)
Previous Message The Hermit Hacker 1999-04-26 16:39:44 Re: [HACKERS] It would be nice if this could be fixed...