| From: | "Brett W(dot) McCoy" <bmccoy(at)chapelperilous(dot)net> |
|---|---|
| To: | Lincoln Yeoh <lylyeoh(at)mecomb(dot)com> |
| Cc: | Erich <hh(at)cyberpass(dot)net>, pgsql-general(at)postgresql(dot)org |
| Subject: | Re: Postgresql usage clip. |
| Date: | 2000-05-30 02:28:03 |
| Message-ID: | Pine.LNX.4.10.10005292227060.15474-100000@chapelperilous.net |
| Views: | Raw Message | Whole Thread | Download mbox | Resend email |
| Thread: | |
| Lists: | pgsql-general |
On Tue, 30 May 2000, Lincoln Yeoh wrote:
> >What an insulting article! They say that PostgreSQL is "equal" in
> >efficiency to MS SQL. The rest of it was pretty good, though.
>
> Actually it said efficacy - more like effectiveness. You can be efficient
> but not effective and vice versa.
Efficient but not effective... you mean like MySQL? :-P
Brett W. McCoy
http://www.chapelperilous.net
---------------------------------------------------------------------------
"The Lord gave us farmers two strong hands so we could grab as much as
we could with both of them."
-- Joseph Heller, "Catch-22"
| From | Date | Subject | |
|---|---|---|---|
| Next Message | Joseph Shraibman | 2000-05-30 02:28:58 | Re: Is PostgreSQL multi-threaded? |
| Previous Message | Lamar Owen | 2000-05-30 02:11:33 | Re: Postgresql usage clip. |