Skip site navigation (1) Skip section navigation (2)

Re: [HACKERS] Re: CORBA again. (was: light dawns: serious bug in FE/BE protocol handling)

From: Todd Graham Lewis <tlewis(at)mindspring(dot)net>
To: Taral <taral(at)taral(dot)net>
Cc: Goran Thyni <goran(at)kyla(dot)kiruna(dot)se>, Tom Lane <tgl(at)sss(dot)pgh(dot)pa(dot)us>, pgsql-hackers(at)postgreSQL(dot)org
Subject: Re: [HACKERS] Re: CORBA again. (was: light dawns: serious bug in FE/BE protocol handling)
Date: 1999-04-26 18:16:49
Message-ID: Pine.LNX.4.04.9904261416250.9925-100000@reflections.eng.mindspring.net (view raw or flat)
Thread:
Lists: pgsql-hackers
On Mon, 26 Apr 1999, Taral wrote:

> We are explicitly designing the system to allow any CORBA 2.2
> implementation with the C++ mapping supported to be used.

Given that PostgreSQL is a C project, why not use a C ORB like ORBit?
It's a whole lot faster than MICO...

--
Todd Graham Lewis                        Postmaster, MindSpring Enterprises
tlewis(at)mindspring(dot)net                                (800) 719-4664, x22804

"A pint of sweat will save a gallon of blood."          -- George S. Patton


In response to

Responses

pgsql-hackers by date

Next:From: Todd Graham LewisDate: 1999-04-26 18:18:20
Subject: Re: [HACKERS] Re: CORBA again. (was: light dawns: serious bug in FE/BE protocol handling)
Previous:From: TaralDate: 1999-04-26 18:14:04
Subject: Re: CORBA again. (was: light dawns: serious bug in FE/BE protocol handling)

Privacy Policy | About PostgreSQL
Copyright © 1996-2014 The PostgreSQL Global Development Group