Skip site navigation (1) Skip section navigation (2)

Re: [GENERAL] Re: [HACKERS] [Fwd: SGVLLUG Oracle and Informix on Linux]

From: Chris Johnson <cmj(at)inline-design(dot)com>
To: PostgreSQL-general <pgsql-general(at)postgreSQL(dot)org>
Subject: Re: [GENERAL] Re: [HACKERS] [Fwd: SGVLLUG Oracle and Informix on Linux]
Date: 1998-07-27 21:06:25
Message-ID: Pine.LNX.4.00.9807271702570.30845-100000@boreus.bedfo.ma.tiac.net (view raw or flat)
Thread:
Lists: pgsql-generalpgsql-hackers
> > >        Let's remove the "I don't want to think" utilities like
> > >{create,destroy}{db,user} and force DBA's to actually use the *proper*
> > >functions.

IMHO (actually make that IMVeryHO) This is probably a bad idea... We
should just update the man pages to detail the SQL code that can be used
instead of the command.  It doesn't hurt anything/anyone to leave the
programs as they are, and can even be helpful to people writing scripts to
automate management of their servers.

Chris



In response to

Responses

pgsql-hackers by date

Next:From: Bruce TongDate: 1998-07-27 21:30:16
Subject: Re: [GENERAL] Re: [HACKERS] [Fwd: SGVLLUG Oracle and Informix on Linux]
Previous:From: Vadim MikheevDate: 1998-07-27 20:31:38
Subject: Re: [HACKERS] Q about read committed in Oracle...

pgsql-general by date

Next:From: Chris JohnsonDate: 1998-07-27 21:14:53
Subject: Re: [GENERAL] Re: [HACKERS] [Fwd: SGVLLUG Oracle and Informix on Linux]
Previous:From: James Olin OdenDate: 1998-07-27 18:23:33
Subject: Re: [GENERAL] Postgres vs commercial products

Privacy Policy | About PostgreSQL
Copyright © 1996-2014 The PostgreSQL Global Development Group