| From: | "j(dot) eidsness" <tempest(at)wolfen(dot)com> |
|---|---|
| To: | Eric Enockson <eric(at)broken(dot)net> |
| Cc: | pgsql-interfaces(at)postgreSQL(dot)org |
| Subject: | Re: [INTERFACES] best postgres interface |
| Date: | 1999-03-25 09:33:22 |
| Message-ID: | Pine.LNX.3.96.990325012913.1783A-100000@wolfen.com |
| Views: | Raw Message | Whole Thread | Download mbox | Resend email |
| Thread: | |
| Lists: | pgsql-interfaces |
On Wed, 24 Mar 1999, Eric Enockson wrote:
=
= I see there are a couple of perl interfaces to
= postgres. Does anyone have any comments as to the
= best? I would prefer to use perl but if people
= think is this the wrong way to go i would like
= to know.
=
= Thanks in advance
= Eric enockson
I cannot tell you what the 'best' interface is, but i can tell you
that *I* use perl (mostly cause i dunno C or C++) and it works fine. It's
very flexible and returns tuples in a very managable manner. So far i have
no reason to knock it, other than the fact that you application is already
writeen in some other language (or you jus hate perl :)
[ ======================= jeff eidsness = ]
[ = webmaster =========================== ]
[ ===== http://www.wolfen.com/calendar/ = ]
| From | Date | Subject | |
|---|---|---|---|
| Next Message | D'Arcy J.M. Cain | 1999-03-25 11:57:48 | Re: [INTERFACES] best postgres interface |
| Previous Message | Dave Page | 1999-03-25 08:31:22 | RE: [INTERFACES] PgAdmin |