| From: | Peter T Mount <peter(at)retep(dot)org(dot)uk> |
|---|---|
| To: | Bruce Momjian <maillist(at)candle(dot)pha(dot)pa(dot)us> |
| Cc: | PostgreSQL-development <hackers(at)postgresql(dot)org> |
| Subject: | Re: [HACKERS] Large objects names |
| Date: | 1998-08-06 05:59:49 |
| Message-ID: | Pine.LNX.3.96.980806065832.793I-100000@maidast.retep.org.uk |
| Views: | Raw Message | Whole Thread | Download mbox | Resend email |
| Thread: | |
| Lists: | pgsql-hackers pgsql-interfaces |
On Wed, 5 Aug 1998, Bruce Momjian wrote:
> Currently, large objects are stored internally as xinv### and xinx###.
>
> I would like to rename this for 6.4 to be _lobject_### to prevent
> namespace collisions, and make them clearer for administrators.
>
> However, this may cause problems for backward compatability for large
> object users. As I see there are going to be other new large object
> things in 6.4, it may not be an issue.
>
> Is is OK to rename them internally?
Shouldn't be a problem. JDBC does refer to the xin prefix with the
getTables method, so it's simply a single change there.
--
Peter T Mount peter(at)retep(dot)org(dot)uk or petermount(at)earthling(dot)net
Main Homepage: http://www.retep.org.uk
PostgreSQL JDBC Faq: http://www.retep.org.uk/postgres
| From | Date | Subject | |
|---|---|---|---|
| Next Message | Thomas G. Lockhart | 1998-08-06 06:09:31 | Re: [HACKERS] OR clause status |
| Previous Message | Thomas G. Lockhart | 1998-08-06 05:59:48 | Re: [HACKERS] indexes and floats |
| From | Date | Subject | |
|---|---|---|---|
| Next Message | Antonio Garcia Mari | 1998-08-06 09:17:13 | Re: [INTERFACES] Accessing PostgreSQL server on linux from windows NT server |
| Previous Message | Bruce Momjian | 1998-08-06 05:27:53 | Re: [HACKERS] Large objects names |