Re: [HACKERS] CVS and the backend

From: Peter T Mount <peter(at)retep(dot)org(dot)uk>
To: Bruce Momjian <maillist(at)candle(dot)pha(dot)pa(dot)us>
Cc: hackers(at)postgresql(dot)org
Subject: Re: [HACKERS] CVS and the backend
Date: 1998-08-06 05:34:55
Message-ID: Pine.LNX.3.96.980806063231.793E-100000@maidast.retep.org.uk
Views: Raw Message | Whole Thread | Download mbox | Resend email
Thread:
Lists: pgsql-hackers

On Wed, 5 Aug 1998, Bruce Momjian wrote:

> >
> > I've just run CVS UPDATE again, in another attempt to get initdb to run.
> > Anyhow, I noticed that there was a message saying that there were
> > conflicts. Any ideas?
> >
>
> Conflicts between your cvs tree and the current tree, meaning you
> committed stuff and it could not merge the changes into your tree?
>
> I use this script to remove changed files in my distribution.
>
> :
> cd /pgcvs &&
> pn pgcvs -qn update pgsql | grep '^M ' | cut -d' ' -f2 | xargs rm
> pgupdate

I'll try this.

It's strange, because I haven't actually made any changes recently, and
the errors have occured since I got a fresh set from the server.

As for the initdb problem, it's getting further now. It's now hanging
while creating the pg_user view.

--
Peter T Mount peter(at)retep(dot)org(dot)uk or petermount(at)earthling(dot)net
Main Homepage: http://www.retep.org.uk
PostgreSQL JDBC Faq: http://www.retep.org.uk/postgres

In response to

Browse pgsql-hackers by date

  From Date Subject
Next Message Peter T Mount 1998-08-06 05:45:16 Re: [HACKERS] SPI procedure for removing large objects
Previous Message Bruce Momjian 1998-08-06 05:27:53 Re: [HACKERS] Large objects names