| From: | Peter T Mount <peter(at)taer(dot)maidstone(dot)gov(dot)uk> |
|---|---|
| To: | Dallas Hockley <hockleyd(at)cybersoft(dot)ab(dot)ca> |
| Cc: | Jeffrey Napolitano <jnapoli(at)setech(dot)com>, Interface to PostgreSQL <pgsql-interfaces(at)postgresql(dot)org> |
| Subject: | Re: [INTERFACES] "static" libraries? |
| Date: | 1998-07-21 12:33:13 |
| Message-ID: | Pine.LNX.3.96.980721133256.2998J-100000@taer.maidstone.gov.uk |
| Views: | Whole Thread | Raw Message | Download mbox | Resend email |
| Thread: | |
| Lists: | pgsql-interfaces |
[email problems within maidstone.gov.uk has delayed this response -
peter]
On Thu, 16 Jul 1998, Dallas Hockley wrote:
> Jeffrey Napolitano wrote:
> >
> > I have a Java application which uses JDBC, and it is going to put on a
> > few different machines using postgres and postgres's JDBC driver. My
> > question is this: Is there a method of *including* the JDBC driver into
> > the Java application? An equivalent to statically linking a library in
>
>
> This can be done by "unjarring" the postgresql jdbc driver jar in the
> base class directory of your app/let and then jar'ring the entire
> distribution into one file. The relative class resolution must be
> correct, and it will work....
It will work that way.
The down side to this is that if a newer version of the driver is
released, then you have to rebuild your application jar file.
--
Peter Mount (at work) peter(at)taer(dot)maidstone(dot)gov(dot)uk or peter(at)maidstone(dot)gov(dot)uk
If you mail me here, please cc my home address peter(at)retep(dot)org(dot)uk
| From | Date | Subject | |
|---|---|---|---|
| Next Message | Byron Nikolaidis | 1998-07-21 13:11:31 | Re: [INTERFACES] odbc driver for a linux box |
| Previous Message | Peter T Mount | 1998-07-21 12:32:31 | Re: [INTERFACES] Using JDBC and SSL (or any method of security) |