Re: [INTERFACES] Re: [HACKERS] changes in 6.4

From: Peter T Mount <peter(at)retep(dot)org(dot)uk>
To: David Hartwig <daveh(at)insightdist(dot)com>
Cc: Hannu Krosing <hannu(at)trust(dot)ee>, Bruce Momjian <maillist(at)candle(dot)pha(dot)pa(dot)us>, pgsql-interfaces(at)postgresql(dot)org, hackers(at)postgresql(dot)org
Subject: Re: [INTERFACES] Re: [HACKERS] changes in 6.4
Date: 1998-07-16 17:30:25
Message-ID: Pine.LNX.3.96.980716182806.1202S-100000@maidast.retep.org.uk
Views: Raw Message | Whole Thread | Download mbox | Resend email
Thread:
Lists: pgsql-general pgsql-hackers pgsql-interfaces

On Wed, 15 Jul 1998, David Hartwig wrote:

> This is really big for the ODBCers. (And I suspect for JDBCers too.) Many
> desktop libraries and end-user tools depend on this "record set" strategy to
> operate effectively.

Although I haven't seen what they produce, it is possible that JBuilder
and others do have this affect with JDBC.

However, not all JDBC applications have this problem. Infact the majority
I've seen only produce much simpler queries.

--
Peter T Mount peter(at)retep(dot)org(dot)uk or petermount(at)earthling(dot)net
Main Homepage: http://www.retep.org.uk
************ Someday I may rebuild this signature completely ;-) ************
Work Homepage: http://www.maidstone.gov.uk Work EMail: peter(at)maidstone(dot)gov(dot)uk

In response to

Browse pgsql-general by date

  From Date Subject
Next Message Jeffrey Napolitano 1998-07-16 17:44:28 pg_version and version
Previous Message Peter T Mount 1998-07-16 17:27:03 Re: [INTERFACES] Re: [HACKERS] changes in 6.4

Browse pgsql-hackers by date

  From Date Subject
Next Message ocie 1998-07-16 18:10:18 Re: [HACKERS] How about re-moderating pgsql-announce?
Previous Message Peter T Mount 1998-07-16 17:27:03 Re: [INTERFACES] Re: [HACKERS] changes in 6.4

Browse pgsql-interfaces by date

  From Date Subject
Next Message Jeffrey Napolitano 1998-07-16 17:53:20 "static" libraries?
Previous Message Peter T Mount 1998-07-16 17:27:03 Re: [INTERFACES] Re: [HACKERS] changes in 6.4