| From: | "Jose' Soares Da Silva" <sferac(at)bo(dot)nettuno(dot)it> |
|---|---|
| To: | Byron Nikolaidis <byronn(at)insightdist(dot)com> |
| Cc: | interfaces postgres <pgsql-interfaces(at)PostgreSQL(dot)org> |
| Subject: | Re: M$-Access'97 and TIMESTAMPs |
| Date: | 1998-06-09 17:25:11 |
| Message-ID: | Pine.LNX.3.96.980609171913.4406A-100000@proxy.bazzanese.com |
| Views: | Raw Message | Whole Thread | Download mbox | Resend email |
| Thread: | |
| Lists: | pgsql-hackers pgsql-interfaces |
On Tue, 9 Jun 1998, Byron Nikolaidis wrote:
>
>
> Jose' Soares Da Silva wrote:
>
> > Hi, all!
> >
> > I created a table with a TIMESTAMP data type to use with M$-Access, because
> > Access uses such field to control concurrent access on records.
> > But I have a problem M$-Access doesn't recognize a TIMESTAMP type, it see
> > such fields as "text" instead of "date/time".
> > Is there a way to make Access recognize TIMESTAMPs ?
> > Thanks, Jose'
>
> I could add TimeStamp as a supported data type of the odbc driver. Currently,
> 'abstime' is supported but not 'timestamp'.
>
Thank you Byron.
I think this is great. M$-Access should work well with a timestamp field,
I have problems with concurrent access and I think it is because this data type.
Jose'
| From | Date | Subject | |
|---|---|---|---|
| Next Message | Bruce Momjian | 1998-06-09 17:27:18 | Re: [HACKERS] v6.4 - What is planned...? |
| Previous Message | Bruce Momjian | 1998-06-09 17:25:09 | Re: [HACKERS] v6.4 - What is planned...? |
| From | Date | Subject | |
|---|---|---|---|
| Next Message | Jose' Soares Da Silva | 1998-06-10 09:27:01 | Re: [INTERFACES] Re: M$-Access'97 and TIMESTAMPs |
| Previous Message | Byron Nikolaidis | 1998-06-09 15:55:41 | Re: [INTERFACES] M$-Access'97 and TIMESTAMPs |