| From: | "Jose' Soares Da Silva" <sferac(at)bo(dot)nettuno(dot)it> |
|---|---|
| To: | questions postgres <pgsql-general(at)PostgreSQL(dot)org> |
| Cc: | interfaces postgres <pgsql-interfaces(at)PostgreSQL(dot)org> |
| Subject: | TIMESTAMP automatic |
| Date: | 1998-06-05 17:09:49 |
| Message-ID: | Pine.LNX.3.96.980605170108.6418A-100000@proxy.bazzanese.com |
| Views: | Raw Message | Whole Thread | Download mbox | Resend email |
| Thread: | |
| Lists: | pgsql-general pgsql-interfaces |
Hi all!
I have a question about TIMESTAMPs.
Some databases are a TIMESTAMP type that updates automatically
when the record is modified.
M$-Access uses such field to control concurrent access to a table.
Somebody knows if this behavior is SQL standard ?
Thanks, Jose'
| From | Date | Subject | |
|---|---|---|---|
| Next Message | JohnDz | 1998-06-05 17:21:37 | Tcl/tk and postgreSQL |
| Previous Message | The Hermit Hacker | 1998-06-05 16:08:32 | Re: [HACKERS] NEW POSTGRESQL LOGOS |
| From | Date | Subject | |
|---|---|---|---|
| Next Message | JohnDz | 1998-06-05 17:21:37 | Tcl/tk and postgreSQL |
| Previous Message | Jose' Soares Da Silva | 1998-06-05 14:35:28 | Re: [INTERFACES] PgAccess running on Win95 ? |