Skip site navigation (1) Skip section navigation (2)

Re: [HACKERS] Re: [INTERFACES] ODBC is slow with M$-Access Report

From: "Jose' Soares Da Silva" <sferac(at)bo(dot)nettuno(dot)it>
To: Bruce Momjian <maillist(at)candle(dot)pha(dot)pa(dot)us>
Cc: daveh(at)insightdist(dot)com, pgsql-interfaces(at)postgreSQL(dot)org, pgsql-hackers(at)postgreSQL(dot)org, "Vadim B(dot) Mikheev" <vadim(at)sable(dot)krasnoyarsk(dot)su>
Subject: Re: [HACKERS] Re: [INTERFACES] ODBC is slow with M$-Access Report
Date: 1998-06-04 11:59:59
Message-ID: Pine.LNX.3.96.980604114945.1478A-100000@proxy.bazzanese.com (view raw or flat)
Thread:
Lists: pgsql-hackerspgsql-interfaces
On Tue, 2 Jun 1998, Bruce Momjian wrote:

> > 3. The times required to run complex reports (for example those that
> > include LEFT JOINS) is very long (about 15 minutes to retrieve
> > 2850 rows).
> 
> Yea, we need this too.  Not sure where we are with this.  Can you give
> an example?
Our problem is linked with using sub-reports, for now we solved this problem 
using queries instead of sub-reports and it works well.
                                                          Thanks any way,
							       Jose'


In response to

pgsql-hackers by date

Next:From: Tom GoodDate: 1998-06-04 12:05:25
Subject: Re: [GENERAL] NEW POSTGRESQL LOGOS
Previous:From: The Hermit HackerDate: 1998-06-04 11:51:41
Subject: Re: [HACKERS] NEW POSTGRESQL LOGOS

pgsql-interfaces by date

Next:From: Wayne WilliamsonDate: 1998-06-04 14:23:09
Subject: subscribe
Previous:From: Jose' Soares Da SilvaDate: 1998-06-04 11:37:27
Subject: PgAccess running on Win95 ?

Privacy Policy | About PostgreSQL
Copyright © 1996-2014 The PostgreSQL Global Development Group