On Thu, 2 Nov 2000, Zeugswetter Andreas SB wrote:
> > Well I can re-write and resubmit this patch. Add it as a
> > compile time option
> > is not bad idea. Second possibility is distribute it as patch
> > in the contrib
> > tree. And if it until not good tested not dirty with this main tree...
> > Ok, I next week prepare it...
> One thing that worries me though is, that it extends the sql language,
> and there has been no discussion about the chosen syntax.
> Imho the standard embedded SQL syntax (prepare ...) could be a
> starting point.
Yes, you are right... my PREPARE/EXECUTE is not too much ready to SQL92,
I some old letter I speculate about "SAVE/EXECUTE PLAN" instead
PREPARE/EXECUTE. But don't forget, it will *experimental* patch... we can
change it in future ..etc.
In response to
pgsql-hackers by date
|Next:||From: Lamar Owen||Date: 2000-11-02 15:28:21|
|Subject: Re: Re: [GENERAL] 7.0 vs. 7.1 (was: latest version?)|
|Previous:||From: Denis Perchine||Date: 2000-11-02 13:39:29|
|Subject: DROP hangup...|