> > We already tell about it, but yes, you are right too. But it is not
> > implemented yet.
> I am inclined to think it helps to have this configurable at the user
> level too, but let's see what people come up with.
Yes, I too, but it is the good theme for flame-war, all can have right.
For example user that is used for web-server connection needs only
small privilage (SELECT) and why for _all_ tables run GRANT if I can set it
as global option.
I very expect new ACL, because I'm admin for large DB with critical data
and with more sub-admins and users and groups (..etc.) and I need good
tools for user restriction/control.
And implement all oneself via triggers (columns privilage) is very
In response to
pgsql-patches by date
|Next:||From: Denis Perchine||Date: 2000-06-12 16:28:23|
|Subject: Caching number of blocks in relation to avoi lseek.|
|Previous:||From: Tom Lane||Date: 2000-06-12 16:11:15|
|Subject: Re: BeOS Diff Take 3 |