From:
Karel Zak <zakkr(at)zf(dot)jcu(dot)cz>
To:
Don Baccus <dhogaza(at)pacifier(dot)com>
Cc:
Thomas Lockhart <lockhart(at)alumni(dot)caltech(dot)edu>,
pgsql-hackers <pgsql-hackers(at)postgresql(dot)org>
Subject:
Re: pg_dumplo, thanks :) (fwd)
Date:
2000-04-06 16:17:49
Message-ID:
Pine.LNX.3.96.1000406180256.474B-100000@ara.zf.jcu.cz (view raw or flat )
Thread:
2000-04-06 11:02:45 from Karel Zak <zakkr(at)zf(dot)jcu(dot)cz>
2000-04-06 13:37:25 from Thomas Lockhart <lockhart(at)alumni(dot)caltech(dot)edu>
2000-04-06 13:49:15 from Karel Zak <zakkr(at)zf(dot)jcu(dot)cz>
2000-06-12 04:01:54 from Bruce Momjian <pgman(at)candle(dot)pha(dot)pa(dot)us>
2000-06-12 08:44:07 from Karel Zak <zakkr(at)zf(dot)jcu(dot)cz>
2000-06-12 04:02:31 from Bruce Momjian <pgman(at)candle(dot)pha(dot)pa(dot)us>
2000-06-12 09:30:59 from Karel Zak <zakkr(at)zf(dot)jcu(dot)cz>
2000-04-06 14:20:19 from Don Baccus <dhogaza(at)pacifier(dot)com>
2000-04-06 16:17:49 from Karel Zak <zakkr(at)zf(dot)jcu(dot)cz>
2000-04-06 17:33:11 from Don Baccus <dhogaza(at)pacifier(dot)com>
2000-04-06 18:05:55 from Bruce Momjian <pgman(at)candle(dot)pha(dot)pa(dot)us>
2000-04-06 18:46:40 from Don Baccus <dhogaza(at)pacifier(dot)com>
2000-04-06 18:58:08 from Bruce Momjian <pgman(at)candle(dot)pha(dot)pa(dot)us>
2000-04-06 19:14:01 from Lamar Owen <lamar(dot)owen(at)wgcr(dot)org>
2000-04-06 18:06:50 from Bruce Momjian <pgman(at)candle(dot)pha(dot)pa(dot)us>
2000-04-06 18:40:54 from Karel Zak <zakkr(at)zf(dot)jcu(dot)cz>
2000-04-06 18:58:06 from Don Baccus <dhogaza(at)pacifier(dot)com>
2000-04-06 18:50:25 from Don Baccus <dhogaza(at)pacifier(dot)com>
Lists:
pgsql-hackers pgsql-patches
On Thu, 6 Apr 2000, Don Baccus wrote:
> If it runs as a separate utility, there's no way for it to guarantee
> a dump consistent with the previous run of pg_dump, right?
If you dump your tables via pg_dump and promptly you dump LO via
pg_dumplo, IMHO you not have problem with DB consistency. In table-dump
is in columns OID which use LO-dump index.
> So wouldn't it be better to fold pg_dumplo into pg_dump?
Yes. If I good remember, anyone plan rewrite pg_dump. Or not? If not, I can
rewrite it, because I very need good backup tools (I have important large
databases (with LO too)).
Karel
In response to
Responses
pgsql-hackers by date
Next :From: The Hermit HackerDate: 2000-04-06 16:19:09
Subject : Re: 7.1 items
Previous :From : Theo KramerDate : 2000-04-06 16:09:02
Subject : Re: 7.1 items
pgsql-patches by date
Next :From: Don BaccusDate: 2000-04-06 17:33:11
Subject : Re: pg_dumplo, thanks :) (fwd)
Previous :From : Don BaccusDate : 2000-04-06 14:20:19
Subject : Re: pg_dumplo, thanks :) (fwd)