From: | Terry Mackintosh <terry(at)terrym(dot)com> |
---|---|
To: | PostgreSQL-development <hackers(at)postgreSQL(dot)org> |
Subject: | Re: [HACKERS] Dumping of views -- done! |
Date: | 1998-10-04 03:11:04 |
Message-ID: | Pine.LNX.3.95.981003230720.25181A-100000@terry1.acun.com |
Views: | Raw Message | Whole Thread | Download mbox | Resend email |
Thread: | |
Lists: | pgsql-hackers |
Hi Bruce
On Sat, 3 Oct 1998, Bruce Momjian wrote:
> I though we dumped views already. If not, I am inclinded to apply it,
Your comment gave me cause to go read the pg_dump man page again, here is
what it has to say:
rules and views
pg_dump does not understand user-defined rules and
views and will fail to dump them properly. (This
is due to the fact that rules are stored as plans
in the catalogs and not textually)
Now, I did not (yet) do any thing about rules, only views.
Have a great day
Terry Mackintosh <terry(at)terrym(dot)com> http://www.terrym.com
sysadmin/owner Please! No MIME encoded or HTML mail, unless needed.
Proudly powered by R H Linux 4.2, Apache 1.3, PHP 3, PostgreSQL 6.3
-------------------------------------------------------------------
Success Is A Choice ... book by Rick Patino, get it, read it!
From | Date | Subject | |
---|---|---|---|
Next Message | Bruce Momjian | 1998-10-04 03:32:14 | Re: [HACKERS] RE: [GENERAL] Long update query ? (also Re: [GENERAL] CNF vs. DNF) |
Previous Message | Terry Mackintosh | 1998-10-04 02:49:14 | Re: [HACKERS] Dumping of views -- done! |