Re: [GENERAL] Re: Large Objects

From: Jeroen Schaap <jeroen(at)rulffh(dot)medfac(dot)leidenuniv(dot)nl>
To: James Oden <joden(at)lee(dot)k12(dot)nc(dot)us>
Cc: pgsql-general(at)postgreSQL(dot)org, David Giffin <david(at)agent911(dot)com>
Subject: Re: [GENERAL] Re: Large Objects
Date: 1998-11-20 15:56:59
Message-ID: Pine.LNX.3.91.981120165553.13673B-100000@rulffh.medfac.leidenuniv.nl
Views: Raw Message | Whole Thread | Download mbox | Resend email
Thread:
Lists: pgsql-general

On Fri, 20 Nov 1998, James Oden wrote:

> |1) What exactly do you mean with 'view'?
> | A large object is referenced by its OID (objectID). You just can dump
> |the object to a file and view the file.
> I read somewhere (a while back) that postgres internally stores large
> objects as single files on the filesystem. Is this still the case? If it
> is is there anywork being done to change this?

Yes, it still is a seperate file... seems to be a straightforward
approach. What's wrong with that?

Jeroen

Jeroen Schaap.............I was dreaming of guitarnotes that would irritate
Homepage: <http://rulffh.medfac.leidenuniv.nl>..| ^|^ |...an executive kind
Keywords: Guitars, Linux, Mac and SCN...........\_`-'_/..............of guy
Tel: (0)71-5276811................................| |...........Frank Zappa

In response to

Responses

Browse pgsql-general by date

  From Date Subject
Next Message Oleg Broytmann 1998-11-20 16:20:10 Date/time problem
Previous Message Gilley, Charles H. 1998-11-20 15:17:33 RE: [GENERAL] Loading a database, why do I need superuser?