| From: | Greg Smith <gsmith(at)gregsmith(dot)com> |
|---|---|
| To: | Tom Lane <tgl(at)sss(dot)pgh(dot)pa(dot)us> |
| Cc: | Magnus Hagander <magnus(at)hagander(dot)net>, Alvaro Herrera <alvherre(at)commandprompt(dot)com>, pgsql-hackers(at)postgresql(dot)org |
| Subject: | Re: Shouldn't pg_settings.enumvals be array of text? |
| Date: | 2008-10-07 05:58:16 |
| Message-ID: | Pine.GSO.4.64.0810070143250.9638@westnet.com |
| Views: | Raw Message | Whole Thread | Download mbox | Resend email |
| Thread: | |
| Lists: | pgsql-hackers pgsql-www |
On Mon, 6 Oct 2008, Tom Lane wrote:
> Fine with me, but let's be sure this doesn't slide off the radar screen.
> If we forget about it and release 8.4 with the current definition of the
> column, it'll be too late to change it.
Agreed and understood. I hope to have some basic postgresql.conf tuning
tools packaged by the time 8.4 is released, and everything needed to sort
out the server-side of that is in my critical path for things that need to
happen before November 1. text[] is my preferred format for some other
things I'm working on, so anything that uses that for a list instead of a
string I have to parse is a long-term win.
--
* Greg Smith gsmith(at)gregsmith(dot)com http://www.gregsmith.com Baltimore, MD
| From | Date | Subject | |
|---|---|---|---|
| Next Message | Simon Riggs | 2008-10-07 06:21:25 | Re: Reducing some DDL Locks to ShareLock |
| Previous Message | Robert Haas | 2008-10-07 04:18:10 | Re: Common Table Expressions applied; some issues remain |
| From | Date | Subject | |
|---|---|---|---|
| Next Message | Magnus Hagander | 2008-10-07 08:00:58 | Re: Shouldn't pg_settings.enumvals be array of text? |
| Previous Message | Joshua Drake | 2008-10-06 23:17:56 | Re: Fwd: Supporters of Gin index |