Re: Proposal: temporal extension "period" data type

From: Greg Smith <gsmith(at)gregsmith(dot)com>
To: Jeff Davis <pgsql(at)j-davis(dot)com>
Cc: pgsql-hackers <pgsql-hackers(at)postgresql(dot)org>
Subject: Re: Proposal: temporal extension "period" data type
Date: 2008-05-26 12:49:03
Message-ID: Pine.GSO.4.64.0805260845040.24771@westnet.com
Views: Raw Message | Whole Thread | Download mbox | Resend email
Thread:
Lists: pgsql-hackers

On Mon, 26 May 2008, Jeff Davis wrote:

> And including in core has the usual drawbacks, like waiting for a new
> PostgreSQL release just to get some improvement for the data type.

How stable has the core code implementation been recently? If major
changes to it are unlikely anyway because it's matured, this downside is a
lot less important.

--
* Greg Smith gsmith(at)gregsmith(dot)com http://www.gregsmith.com Baltimore, MD

In response to

Responses

Browse pgsql-hackers by date

  From Date Subject
Next Message Michael Meskes 2008-05-26 13:08:47 Re: Updated patch (Re: [PATCHES] WITH RECURSIVE patch V0.1)
Previous Message ITAGAKI Takahiro 2008-05-26 12:42:38 Re: Read Uncommitted