Re: Postgres 8.2 memory weirdness

From: Greg Smith <gsmith(at)gregsmith(dot)com>
To: Tory M Blue <tmblue(at)gmail(dot)com>
Cc: pgsql-performance(at)postgresql(dot)org
Subject: Re: Postgres 8.2 memory weirdness
Date: 2008-01-28 00:08:51
Message-ID: Pine.GSO.4.64.0801251256540.4724@westnet.com
Views: Raw Message | Whole Thread | Download mbox | Resend email
Thread:
Lists: pgsql-performance

On Fri, 25 Jan 2008, Tory M Blue wrote:

> I doubled the checkpoint segments yesterday and have not seen any
> warnings. Will run with segments of 100 for a while and see how things
> look.. Anyway to make sure that there is not a number between 50 and
> 100 that makes more sense?

More segments means more disk space taken up with them and a longer crash
recovery. Those are the downsides; if you can live with those there's no
reason to run at <100 if that works for you. Fine-tuning here isn't
really that helpful.

I'm a little confused by your report through because you should still be
seeing regular checkpoint warnings if you set checkpoint_warning = 3600s ,
they should just be spaced further apart.

--
* Greg Smith gsmith(at)gregsmith(dot)com http://www.gregsmith.com Baltimore, MD

In response to

Responses

Browse pgsql-performance by date

  From Date Subject
Next Message Jignesh K. Shah 2008-01-28 00:53:04 Re: 1 or 2 servers for large DB scenario.
Previous Message Scott Marlowe 2008-01-27 23:54:12 Re: Vacuum and FSM page size