On Fri, 15 Dec 2006, Merlin Moncure wrote:
> The slower is probably due to the unroll loops switch which can
> actually hurt code due to the larger footprint (less cache coherency).
The cache issues are so important with current processors that I'd suggest
throwing -Os (optimize for size) into the mix people test. That one may
stack usefully with -O2, but probably not with -O3 (3 includes
optimizations that increase code size).
* Greg Smith gsmith(at)gregsmith(dot)com http://www.gregsmith.com Baltimore, MD
In response to
pgsql-performance by date
|Next:||From: Tom Lane||Date: 2006-12-15 14:56:57|
|Subject: Re: [HACKERS] EXPLAIN ANALYZE on 8.2 |
|Previous:||From: Merlin Moncure||Date: 2006-12-15 14:23:43|
|Subject: Re: New to PostgreSQL, performance considerations|