Skip site navigation (1) Skip section navigation (2)

Re: [HACKERS] Re: Call for port testing on fmgr changes -- Results!

From: Peter Eisentraut <e99re41(at)DoCS(dot)UU(dot)SE>
To: Tom Lane <tgl(at)sss(dot)pgh(dot)pa(dot)us>
Cc: Ryan Kirkpatrick <pgsql(at)rkirkpat(dot)net>, pgsql-ports(at)postgresql(dot)org, pgsql-hackers(at)postgresql(dot)org
Subject: Re: [HACKERS] Re: Call for port testing on fmgr changes -- Results!
Date: 2000-06-26 12:29:43
Message-ID: Pine.GSO.4.02A.10006261428020.14804-100000@Leopard.DoCS.UU.SE (view raw or flat)
Thread:
Lists: pgsql-hackerspgsql-ports
On Sun, 25 Jun 2000, Tom Lane wrote:

> Probably we should write that off as a platform issue and create an
> Alpha-specific expected-output file for geometry.

I noticed the other day that the geometry output differs with the
compiler optimization level. That can't be good.


-- 
Peter Eisentraut                  Sernanders väg 10:115
peter_e(at)gmx(dot)net                   75262 Uppsala
http://yi.org/peter-e/            Sweden


In response to

Responses

pgsql-ports by date

Next:From: Thomas LockhartDate: 2000-06-26 13:17:37
Subject: Re: [HACKERS] Re: Call for port testing on fmgr changes --Results!
Previous:From: Yutaka tanidaDate: 2000-06-26 11:33:11
Subject: Re: [HACKERS] .exe extension on Windows

pgsql-hackers by date

Next:From: Brian E GallewDate: 2000-06-26 12:44:10
Subject: Re: About the pid and opts files
Previous:From: Zeugswetter Andreas SBDate: 2000-06-26 12:01:15
Subject: AW: Big 7.1 open items

Privacy Policy | About PostgreSQL
Copyright © 1996-2014 The PostgreSQL Global Development Group