Skip site navigation (1) Skip section navigation (2)

Re: [HACKERS] Re: [SQL] prob with aggregate and group by - returns multiplesh

From: Peter Eisentraut <e99re41(at)DoCS(dot)UU(dot)SE>
To: Don Baccus <dhogaza(at)pacifier(dot)com>
Cc: Thomas Lockhart <lockhart(at)alumni(dot)caltech(dot)edu>, Bruce Momjian <pgman(at)candle(dot)pha(dot)pa(dot)us>, Tom Lane <tgl(at)sss(dot)pgh(dot)pa(dot)us>, "'pgsql-sql(at)postgresql(dot)org'" <pgsql-sql(at)postgreSQL(dot)org>, PostgreSQL Development <pgsql-hackers(at)postgreSQL(dot)org>
Subject: Re: [HACKERS] Re: [SQL] prob with aggregate and group by - returns multiplesh
Date: 2000-02-29 16:38:26
Message-ID: Pine.GSO.4.02A.10002291737320.18993-100000@Rama.DoCS.UU.SE (view raw or flat)
Thread:
Lists: pgsql-hackerspgsql-sql
On Tue, 29 Feb 2000, Don Baccus wrote:

> I vote for the SQL92 TEMPORARY.  Let's not add a keyword that is non-standard
> just because one or another commercial database makes use of it, unless
> there's some real functionality to be gained that's not covered by the
> standard.

The difference is that TEMP is already a keyword since 6.5 and we're
considering removing it.

-- 
Peter Eisentraut                  Sernanders väg 10:115
peter_e(at)gmx(dot)net                   75262 Uppsala
http://yi.org/peter-e/            Sweden


In response to

pgsql-hackers by date

Next:From: Thomas LockhartDate: 2000-02-29 16:39:52
Subject: Re: [HACKERS] Re: NOT {NULL|DEFERRABLE} (was: bug in 7.0)
Previous:From: Peter EisentrautDate: 2000-02-29 16:37:08
Subject: Re: [HACKERS] Re: NOT {NULL|DEFERRABLE} (was: bug in 7.0)

pgsql-sql by date

Next:From: Bruce MomjianDate: 2000-02-29 17:19:02
Subject: Re: [HACKERS] Re: [SQL] prob with aggregate and group by - returns multiplesh
Previous:From: Tom LaneDate: 2000-02-29 16:09:37
Subject: Re: [HACKERS] Re: [SQL] prob with aggregate and group by - returns multiplesh

Privacy Policy | About PostgreSQL
Copyright © 1996-2014 The PostgreSQL Global Development Group