Re: [HACKERS] Changes in 7.0

From: Peter Eisentraut <e99re41(at)DoCS(dot)UU(dot)SE>
To: Tom Lane <tgl(at)sss(dot)pgh(dot)pa(dot)us>
Cc: Bruce Momjian <pgman(at)candle(dot)pha(dot)pa(dot)us>, PostgreSQL-development <pgsql-hackers(at)postgreSQL(dot)org>
Subject: Re: [HACKERS] Changes in 7.0
Date: 2000-02-24 16:01:51
Message-ID: Pine.GSO.4.02A.10002241700400.17421-100000@Hummer.DoCS.UU.SE
Views: Raw Message | Whole Thread | Download mbox | Resend email
Thread:
Lists: pgsql-hackers

On Thu, 24 Feb 2000, Tom Lane wrote:

> For a COPY OUT (from the backend), the correct behavior is same as for
> non-copy state: fire off the cancel request and then forget about it.

Do I have to call PQendcopy() is the question.

--
Peter Eisentraut Sernanders vaeg 10:115
peter_e(at)gmx(dot)net 75262 Uppsala
http://yi.org/peter-e/ Sweden

In response to

Responses

Browse pgsql-hackers by date

  From Date Subject
Next Message Peter Eisentraut 2000-02-24 16:03:41 Re: [HACKERS] Re: [BUGS] First experiences with Postgresql 7.0
Previous Message Bruce Momjian 2000-02-24 16:00:49 Re: [HACKERS] Re: [BUGS] First experiences with Postgresql 7.0