| From: | Peter Eisentraut <e99re41(at)DoCS(dot)UU(dot)SE> |
|---|---|
| To: | Bruce Momjian <pgman(at)candle(dot)pha(dot)pa(dot)us> |
| Cc: | Tom Lane <tgl(at)sss(dot)pgh(dot)pa(dot)us>, Chris Bitmead <chris(at)bitmead(dot)com>, pgsql-hackers(at)postgreSQL(dot)org, pgsql-sql(at)postgreSQL(dot)org |
| Subject: | Re: [SQL] Re: [HACKERS] DISTINCT ON: speak now or forever hold your peace |
| Date: | 2000-01-25 10:30:30 |
| Message-ID: | Pine.GSO.4.02A.10001251129520.11899-100000@Val.DoCS.UU.SE |
| Views: | Raw Message | Whole Thread | Download mbox | Resend email |
| Thread: | |
| Lists: | pgsql-hackers pgsql-sql |
On Mon, 24 Jan 2000, Bruce Momjian wrote:
> > In short, it's not clear to me that supporting DISTINCT ON is a good use
> > of our limited resources. I'm willing to pull it out, but not to fix it.
> > Does someone else want to take responsibility for it?
>
> OK, we can disable it and put it on the TODO list. It is already there.
>
Am I wrong or can DISTINCT ON not be rewritten in terms of GROUP BY in all
cases?
--
Peter Eisentraut Sernanders vaeg 10:115
peter_e(at)gmx(dot)net 75262 Uppsala
http://yi.org/peter-e/ Sweden
| From | Date | Subject | |
|---|---|---|---|
| Next Message | Peter Eisentraut | 2000-01-25 10:38:26 | Re: [HACKERS] Happy column dropping |
| Previous Message | Hiroshi Inoue | 2000-01-25 09:53:57 | Re: [HACKERS] Re: vacuum timings |
| From | Date | Subject | |
|---|---|---|---|
| Next Message | Peter Eisentraut | 2000-01-25 10:59:04 | Re: [SQL] DISTINCT ON: speak now or forever hold your peace |
| Previous Message | Julian Scarfe | 2000-01-25 08:30:36 | Re: [SQL] DISTINCT ON: speak now or forever hold your peace |