On Sat, 15 Nov 2008, Jay Howard wrote:
> Turns out I was returning an array of composites after all. Everything
> works as expected when the array elements are simple types.
> That begs the question, though- is supporting arrays of composite types on
> the list of "things to do"?
Sure. The problem here is our poor support of user defined types, not
specifically arrays of composite types.
In response to
pgsql-jdbc by date
|Next:||From: Kris Jurka||Date: 2008-11-16 14:15:27|
|Subject: New drivers released|
|Previous:||From: Kris Jurka||Date: 2008-11-16 12:15:41|
|Subject: Re: Bug report (with solution) on org.postgresql.jdbc2.EscapedFunctions|