Skip site navigation (1) Skip section navigation (2)

Re: AbstractJdbc2Array - another patch

From: Kris Jurka <books(at)ejurka(dot)com>
To: Marek Lewczuk <newsy(at)lewczuk(dot)com>
Cc: pgsql-jdbc <pgsql-jdbc(at)postgresql(dot)org>
Subject: Re: AbstractJdbc2Array - another patch
Date: 2007-10-28 19:12:45
Message-ID: Pine.BSO.4.64.0710281511210.31092@leary.csoft.net (view raw or flat)
Thread:
Lists: pgsql-jdbc

On Fri, 26 Oct 2007, Marek Lewczuk wrote:

> I still think that we should add base type arrays into Oid class - it will 
> work much faster and will be appropriate cause Oid class already contains 
> base types, so it is logical to put there base type arrays too. For user 
> defined types I would provide a way to fetch oid from pg_type - but for now 
> user defined types are not supported. However, if you really think that we 
> should fetch oid for every array type then I'm able to do it but in my 
> opinion we should stick with Oid class for now (only for base types).
>

This makes sense to me, static data for known types, dynamic for unknown.

Kris Jurka

In response to

Responses

pgsql-jdbc by date

Next:From: Marek LewczukDate: 2007-10-28 19:28:59
Subject: Re: AbstractJdbc2Array - another patch
Previous:From: cncinfo@126.comDate: 2007-10-28 18:56:53
Subject: about function overload,a bug?

Privacy Policy | About PostgreSQL
Copyright © 1996-2014 The PostgreSQL Global Development Group