On Fri, 26 Oct 2007, Marek Lewczuk wrote:
> I still think that we should add base type arrays into Oid class - it will
> work much faster and will be appropriate cause Oid class already contains
> base types, so it is logical to put there base type arrays too. For user
> defined types I would provide a way to fetch oid from pg_type - but for now
> user defined types are not supported. However, if you really think that we
> should fetch oid for every array type then I'm able to do it but in my
> opinion we should stick with Oid class for now (only for base types).
This makes sense to me, static data for known types, dynamic for unknown.
In response to
pgsql-jdbc by date
|Next:||From: Marek Lewczuk||Date: 2007-10-28 19:28:59|
|Subject: Re: AbstractJdbc2Array - another patch|
|Previous:||From: email@example.com||Date: 2007-10-28 18:56:53|
|Subject: about function overload,a bug?|