Skip site navigation (1) Skip section navigation (2)

Re: AbstractJdbc2Array - another patch

From: Kris Jurka <books(at)ejurka(dot)com>
To: Marek Lewczuk <newsy(at)lewczuk(dot)com>
Cc: pgsql-jdbc <pgsql-jdbc(at)postgresql(dot)org>
Subject: Re: AbstractJdbc2Array - another patch
Date: 2007-10-28 19:12:45
Message-ID: (view raw or whole thread)
Lists: pgsql-jdbc

On Fri, 26 Oct 2007, Marek Lewczuk wrote:

> I still think that we should add base type arrays into Oid class - it will 
> work much faster and will be appropriate cause Oid class already contains 
> base types, so it is logical to put there base type arrays too. For user 
> defined types I would provide a way to fetch oid from pg_type - but for now 
> user defined types are not supported. However, if you really think that we 
> should fetch oid for every array type then I'm able to do it but in my 
> opinion we should stick with Oid class for now (only for base types).

This makes sense to me, static data for known types, dynamic for unknown.

Kris Jurka

In response to


pgsql-jdbc by date

Next:From: Marek LewczukDate: 2007-10-28 19:28:59
Subject: Re: AbstractJdbc2Array - another patch
Previous:From: cncinfo@126.comDate: 2007-10-28 18:56:53
Subject: about function overload,a bug?

Privacy Policy | About PostgreSQL
Copyright © 1996-2015 The PostgreSQL Global Development Group