On Mon, 16 Jul 2007, Russell Francis wrote:
> Kris Jurka wrote:
>>
>> On Sun, 24 Jun 2007, Russell Francis wrote:
>>
>>> The attached patch aims to improve the current implementation of the
>>> clone() method on classes which extend PGobject.
>>
>> Makes sense, but why are you providing clone implementations in point,
>> money, interval and NullObject instances? Shouldn't this already be
>> handled by PGObject's implementation?
>
> Yes, in all of those cases the clone() implementation in PGobject would
> do what is expected. I suppose I provided the method declarations and
> trivial implementations for clarity but they are not needed.
>
OK, patch applied.
Kris Jurka