Skip site navigation (1) Skip section navigation (2)

Re: So, why isn't *every* buildfarm member failing ecpg right now?

From: Kris Jurka <books(at)ejurka(dot)com>
To: Andrew Dunstan <andrew(at)dunslane(dot)net>
Cc: Tom Lane <tgl(at)sss(dot)pgh(dot)pa(dot)us>, Michael Meskes <meskes(at)postgresql(dot)org>, pgsql-hackers(at)postgresql(dot)org
Subject: Re: So, why isn't *every* buildfarm member failing ecpg right now?
Date: 2007-06-04 17:18:14
Message-ID: Pine.BSO.4.64.0706041305530.19394@leary.csoft.net (view raw or flat)
Thread:
Lists: pgsql-hackers

On Mon, 4 Jun 2007, Andrew Dunstan wrote:

> turnip_moth is also a Solaris 9 box and doesn't seem have the same issue.
>
> Kris, is there anything unusual installed on the box that would make it 
> behave like this?
>

Not sure what's going on here.  I did a manual run of the ecpg tests and 
it completed normally.  This machine is quite out of date and it has a 
large mix of GNU tools with the solaris ones.  Since turnip_moth is 
maintained by Sun I would expect it to be up to date on patches and have 
few non-Sun tools installed.  So it could be using a different interpreter 
or it could be using a broken tool for which a patch has been released. 
I'll try doing a run with the buildfarm client later today to try and 
reproduce this.

Kris Jurka

In response to

Responses

pgsql-hackers by date

Next:From: Wilhansen LiDate: 2007-06-04 17:19:42
Subject: Re: libpq and Binary Data Formats
Previous:From: Florian G. PflugDate: 2007-06-04 16:26:13
Subject: recovery_target_xid & crashes on the master

Privacy Policy | About PostgreSQL
Copyright © 1996-2014 The PostgreSQL Global Development Group