Skip site navigation (1) Skip section navigation (2)

Re: 7.x horology regression test on Solaris buildfarm machines

From: Kris Jurka <books(at)ejurka(dot)com>
To: Tom Lane <tgl(at)sss(dot)pgh(dot)pa(dot)us>
Cc: pgsql-hackers(at)postgreSQL(dot)org
Subject: Re: 7.x horology regression test on Solaris buildfarm machines
Date: 2007-02-27 19:03:35
Message-ID: Pine.BSO.4.64.0702271402480.653@leary.csoft.net (view raw or flat)
Thread:
Lists: pgsql-hackers

On Tue, 27 Feb 2007, Tom Lane wrote:

> No, because for the "standard" regression behavior we have variant
> result files both with and without the DST law change: see horology and
> horology_1.  The issue only comes up for machines that were matching to
> horology-no-DST-before-1970.out (which may be only old HPUX) or
> horology-solaris-1947.out (which I suppose is only Solaris).  The reason
> I got around to making the patch now is I recently updated my old HPUX
> machine for the law change, and so 7.x started to fail for me ...
>

OK, kudu + dragonfly updated.  I probably won't get around to fixing eel 
(cygwin) for some time though.

Kris Jurka


In response to

pgsql-hackers by date

Next:From: Casey DuncanDate: 2007-02-27 19:05:16
Subject: Re: autovacuum next steps, take 2
Previous:From: Tom LaneDate: 2007-02-27 18:50:46
Subject: Re: Implicit casts with generic arrays

Privacy Policy | About PostgreSQL
Copyright © 1996-2014 The PostgreSQL Global Development Group