Skip site navigation (1) Skip section navigation (2)

Re: getProcedureColumns

From: Kris Jurka <books(at)ejurka(dot)com>
To: Jeffrey Cox <namredips(at)gmail(dot)com>
Cc: pgsql-jdbc(at)postgresql(dot)org
Subject: Re: getProcedureColumns
Date: 2007-01-31 23:49:56
Message-ID: Pine.BSO.4.64.0701311846100.18318@leary2.csoft.net (view raw or flat)
Thread:
Lists: pgsql-jdbc

On Wed, 31 Jan 2007, Jeffrey Cox wrote:

> Yea sure... I will look into the COLUM_TYPE issue and write a test case 
> for column names. On that note, when I ran the test suit all the jdbc2 
> test would run fine, however, most of the others failed due to "to many 
> connections".  I of course tried to up my max connections beyond 20, but 
> looks like will need to up shared memory maximums. (which might be 
> interesting given I am on os X. Just never done that since switching). 
> So before I go about figuring all that out, are failures expected? and 
> if not, any thoughts on the number of connections I should configure 
> for?
>

No failures are expected, but it's not surprising for things to go bad 
after completing the jdbc2 tests because that's when it starts testing 
connection pooling stuff that will open a fair number of connections.  I 
don't think it uses more than 20 simultaneous connections so it's likely 
that there are just some that aren't closed or are in the process of 
closing as new ones are opened.

If you can't get these tests straightened out I wouldn't worry about it 
because the changes you are making shouldn't affect any tests beyond the 
jdbc2 ones.

Kris Jurka

In response to

Responses

pgsql-jdbc by date

Next:From: Jeffrey CoxDate: 2007-02-01 06:19:33
Subject: Re: getProcedureColumns
Previous:From: Jeffrey CoxDate: 2007-01-31 23:20:46
Subject: Re: getProcedureColumns

Privacy Policy | About PostgreSQL
Copyright © 1996-2014 The PostgreSQL Global Development Group