Skip site navigation (1) Skip section navigation (2)

Re: Problem with fixed length fields.

From: Kris Jurka <books(at)ejurka(dot)com>
To: Tom Lane <tgl(at)sss(dot)pgh(dot)pa(dot)us>
Cc: Oliver Jowett <oliver(at)opencloud(dot)com>,Dave Smith <dave(dot)smith(at)candata(dot)com>, pgsql-jdbc(at)postgresql(dot)org
Subject: Re: Problem with fixed length fields.
Date: 2004-10-24 20:00:28
Message-ID: (view raw or whole thread)
Lists: pgsql-jdbc

On Sat, 23 Oct 2004, Tom Lane wrote:

> An alternative that might be worth investigating is to specify the type
> as varchar instead of text.  I am not sure of all the ramifications of
> this but in 7.4 and later it seems like it might do what you want.

Yes, that seems to work and doesn't seem to break anything else, so that's 
what I've done.

Kris Jurka

In response to

pgsql-jdbc by date

Next:From: Tom LaneDate: 2004-10-24 20:26:54
Subject: Re: LargeObject API and OIDs
Previous:From: Kris JurkaDate: 2004-10-24 19:36:38
Subject: Re: Translation updates: ru.po

Privacy Policy | About PostgreSQL
Copyright © 1996-2015 The PostgreSQL Global Development Group