On Sat, 23 Oct 2004, Tom Lane wrote:
> An alternative that might be worth investigating is to specify the type
> as varchar instead of text. I am not sure of all the ramifications of
> this but in 7.4 and later it seems like it might do what you want.
Yes, that seems to work and doesn't seem to break anything else, so that's
what I've done.
In response to
pgsql-jdbc by date
|Next:||From: Tom Lane||Date: 2004-10-24 20:26:54|
|Subject: Re: LargeObject API and OIDs |
|Previous:||From: Kris Jurka||Date: 2004-10-24 19:36:38|
|Subject: Re: Translation updates: ru.po|