Skip site navigation (1) Skip section navigation (2)

Re: Problem with fixed length fields.

From: Kris Jurka <books(at)ejurka(dot)com>
To: Tom Lane <tgl(at)sss(dot)pgh(dot)pa(dot)us>
Cc: Oliver Jowett <oliver(at)opencloud(dot)com>,Dave Smith <dave(dot)smith(at)candata(dot)com>, pgsql-jdbc(at)postgresql(dot)org
Subject: Re: Problem with fixed length fields.
Date: 2004-10-24 20:00:28
Message-ID: Pine.BSO.4.56.0410241458360.6112@leary.csoft.net (view raw or flat)
Thread:
Lists: pgsql-jdbc

On Sat, 23 Oct 2004, Tom Lane wrote:

> An alternative that might be worth investigating is to specify the type
> as varchar instead of text.  I am not sure of all the ramifications of
> this but in 7.4 and later it seems like it might do what you want.
> 

Yes, that seems to work and doesn't seem to break anything else, so that's 
what I've done.

Kris Jurka

In response to

pgsql-jdbc by date

Next:From: Tom LaneDate: 2004-10-24 20:26:54
Subject: Re: LargeObject API and OIDs
Previous:From: Kris JurkaDate: 2004-10-24 19:36:38
Subject: Re: Translation updates: ru.po

Privacy Policy | About PostgreSQL
Copyright © 1996-2014 The PostgreSQL Global Development Group