| From: | Kris Jurka <books(at)ejurka(dot)com> | 
|---|---|
| To: | "Jaroslaw J(dot) Pyszny" <arghil(at)poczta(dot)onet(dot)pl> | 
| Cc: | pgsql-jdbc <pgsql-jdbc(at)postgresql(dot)org> | 
| Subject: | Re: Auto-increment serial (Postgresql JDBC driver w/ | 
| Date: | 2004-09-21 01:50:00 | 
| Message-ID: | Pine.BSO.4.56.0409202046080.9396@leary.csoft.net | 
| Views: | Whole Thread | Raw Message | Download mbox | Resend email | 
| Thread: | |
| Lists: | pgsql-jdbc | 
On Mon, 21 Sep 2004, Jaroslaw J. Pyszny wrote:
> Under OO 'serial' columns don't work, because OO doesn't see
> 'serial' as auto-increment type. I know it's pseuso-type, but
> we can detect it. What do you think, about add this feature 
> to driver?
> 
The basic idea looks good to me, but you've made a mistake in the 
isAutoIncrement() method.  You are using the column number from the 
ResultSet to look up the default when you need to actually use that 
column's position in the table.  In fact it looks like the whole method 
body should be moved into the Field class much like the isNullable method 
does.  This also avoid the contrived hash key value.
Finally we prefer patches in context diff format (diff -c).
Kris Jurka
| From | Date | Subject | |
|---|---|---|---|
| Next Message | John R Pierce | 2004-09-21 04:02:12 | Re: "Idle in Transaction" revisited. | 
| Previous Message | Jeffrey Tenny | 2004-09-21 01:21:49 | Re: "Idle in Transaction" revisited. |