On Wed, 6 Jun 2001, [iso-8859-1] Martn Marqus wrote:

> OK, now I'm more then astonished!
> Why was I able to insert as martin then?
> Isn't it true (as the docs say) that when I execute a query over a view with 
> rules, the rules (querys in the DO of the RULE) are executed with permssions 
> of the owner of the rule (or the view? Any way, martin is owner of both) and 
> not of the user that executed the query?

No. With both views and rules, the actions are executed as the user who
executed the query. I don't know if there are plans to allow the 'execute
as owner' for rules, right now this option only exists for the triggers.

In response to

• Re: [HACKERS] something smells bad at 2001-06-06 16:12:46 from Martín Marqués

Responses

• Re: [HACKERS] something smells bad at 2001-06-07 06:26:52 from Martín Marqués

pgsql-hackers by date

Next:	From: Bruce Momjian	Date: 2001-06-07 00:08:03
	Subject: Re: Re: [HACKERS] Outstanding patches
Previous:	From: Robert Forsman	Date: 2001-06-06 22:45:34
	Subject: Re: Daily Digest V1 #1428

pgsql-general by date

Next:	From: Steve Micallef	Date: 2001-06-06 23:55:35
	Subject: Skipping duplicate records?
Previous:	From: Len Morgan	Date: 2001-06-06 23:19:24
	Subject: Re: "trigger"ing a procedure every X minutes