Skip site navigation (1) Skip section navigation (2)

RE: [HACKERS] Data type removal

From: wward <wward(at)gwi(dot)net>
To: "Jackson, DeJuan" <djackson(at)cpsgroup(dot)com>
Cc: The Hermit Hacker <scrappy(at)hub(dot)org>, David Gould <dg(at)illustra(dot)com>, geek+(at)cmu(dot)edu, hackers(at)postgreSQL(dot)org
Subject: RE: [HACKERS] Data type removal
Date: 1998-03-25 02:07:23
Message-ID: Pine.BSI.3.95.980324210606.13834A-100000@river.gwi.net (view raw or flat)
Thread:
Lists: pgsql-hackers

> > 	1. reduced memory footprint
> > 	2. reduced "disk" footprint
> 	3. modularization (In my experience, that in and of itself is a
> benefit.)
THIS IS RIGHT ON !!!

Wayne

> 	3a. Encapsulation 
> 	3b. Re-Organization (isn't always a bad thing)
> 
> I haven't looked at enough of the postgres code to be anything even, in
> any small way, an expert, but I have found that having someone approach
> a problem from a new perspective, when viewed with an open mind is never
> detrimental.  So I for one would like to see what Darren comes up with,
> could be very useful even if it isn't for what he originally intends.
> 
> 	Just my $0.01 ( I can no longer afford a full $0.02)
> 		-DEJ
> 
> 


In response to

pgsql-hackers by date

Next:From: David GouldDate: 1998-03-25 02:34:09
Subject: Re: AW: [HACKERS] Re: PostgreSQL reference manual
Previous:From: Bruce MomjianDate: 1998-03-25 01:57:59
Subject: Re: [HACKERS] Data type removal

Privacy Policy | About PostgreSQL
Copyright © 1996-2014 The PostgreSQL Global Development Group