Re: [GENERAL] Postgres vs commercial products

From: "Brett W(dot) McCoy" <bmccoy(at)lan2wan(dot)com>
To: Bruce Momjian <maillist(at)candle(dot)pha(dot)pa(dot)us>
Cc: The Hermit Hacker <scrappy(at)hub(dot)org>, ahayes(at)ingenia(dot)com, pgsql-general(at)postgreSQL(dot)org
Subject: Re: [GENERAL] Postgres vs commercial products
Date: 1998-07-22 18:53:12
Message-ID: Pine.BSI.3.91.980722145257.7328H-100000@access1.lan2wan.com
Views: Raw Message | Whole Thread | Download mbox | Resend email
Thread:
Lists: pgsql-general

On Wed, 22 Jul 1998, Bruce Momjian wrote:

> University Ingres was first, then commercial Ingres was a split-off.
> PostgreSQL is based on University Ingres.

That's what I thought...

Brett W. McCoy
http://www.lan2wan.com/~bmccoy
-----------------------------------------------------------------------
"The Number of UNIX installations has grown to 10, with more expected."
-- The UNIX Programmer's Manual, 2nd Edition, June, 1972

In response to

Browse pgsql-general by date

  From Date Subject
Next Message The Hermit Hacker 1998-07-22 18:55:20 Revamp'd Web Site...
Previous Message The Hermit Hacker 1998-07-22 18:26:49 Re: [GENERAL] Postgres vs commercial products