Skip site navigation (1) Skip section navigation (2)

Re: Sun performance - Major discovery!

From: Jeff <threshar(at)torgo(dot)978(dot)org>
To: Andrew Sullivan <andrew(at)libertyrms(dot)info>
Cc: "pgsql-performance(at)postgresql(dot)org" <pgsql-performance(at)postgresql(dot)org>
Subject: Re: Sun performance - Major discovery!
Date: 2003-10-08 14:57:34
Message-ID: Pine.BSF.4.44.0310081057090.63351-100000@torgo.978.org (view raw or flat)
Thread:
Lists: pgsql-hackerspgsql-performance
On Wed, 8 Oct 2003, Andrew Sullivan wrote:

> My worry about this test is that it gives us precious little
> knowledge about concurrent connection slowness, which is where I find
> the most significant problems.  When we tried a Sunsoft cc vs gcc 2.95
> on Sol 7 about 1 1/2 years ago, we found more or less no difference
> once we added more than 5 connections (and we always have more than 5
> connections).  It might be worth trying again, though, since we moved
> to Sol 8.
>

The 20x column are the results when I fired up 20 beater concurrently.


--
Jeff Trout <jeff(at)jefftrout(dot)com>
http://www.jefftrout.com/
http://www.stuarthamm.net/



In response to

pgsql-performance by date

Next:From: JeffDate: 2003-10-08 15:00:30
Subject: Re: Sun performance - Major discovery!
Previous:From: Greg StarkDate: 2003-10-08 14:54:24
Subject: Re: Speeding up Aggregates

pgsql-hackers by date

Next:From: JeffDate: 2003-10-08 15:00:30
Subject: Re: Sun performance - Major discovery!
Previous:From: Bruce MomjianDate: 2003-10-08 14:57:31
Subject: Re: Disabling function validation

Privacy Policy | About PostgreSQL
Copyright © 1996-2014 The PostgreSQL Global Development Group