On Wed, 23 Jan 2002, Justin Clift wrote:
> Hi all,
> I have an addition for it :
> Vince Vielhaber wrote:
> > On Tue, 22 Jan 2002, Thomas Lockhart wrote:
> > >
> > > 1) Q: Why does PostgreSQL have a BSD license?
> > > A: PostgreSQL was developed at Berkeley and open-sourced under the
> > > BSD license. That license has served us well over many years.
> > >
> > > 2) Q: Why does PostgreSQL not have a GPL license?
> > > A: See (1)
> 3) Q: Can I try and convince you guys to use the GPL, or maybe even just
> add the GPL to PostgreSQL?
> A: No. You will be ignored and/or flamed depending on how people
> feel at the time.
> Probably flamed.
> And probably with enthusiasm. :)
> Don't do it.
I'm thinking we should just use Lincoln's verbage and be done
Vince Vielhaber -- KA8CSH email: vev(at)michvhf(dot)com http://www.pop4.net
56K Nationwide Dialup from $16.00/mo at Pop4 Networking
Online Campground Directory http://www.camping-usa.com
Online Giftshop Superstore http://www.cloudninegifts.com
In response to
pgsql-hackers by date
|Next:||From: Chris Humphries||Date: 2002-01-22 16:24:31|
|Subject: TODO item question|
|Previous:||From: Tom Lane||Date: 2002-01-22 16:16:11|
|Subject: Re: RFD: schemas and different kinds of Postgres objects |
pgsql-general by date
|Next:||From: Thomas Lockhart||Date: 2002-01-22 16:25:11|
|Subject: Re: [HACKERS] PostgreSQL Licence: GNU/GPL|
|Previous:||From: Ned Wolpert||Date: 2002-01-22 16:11:27|
|Subject: Re: [GENERAL] PostgreSQL Licence: GNU/GPL|