Re: Re: [GENERAL] Re: JDBC Performance

On 18 Oct 2000, Gunnar R|nning wrote:

> Peter Mount <peter(at)retep(dot)org(dot)uk> writes:
>
>
> > > couldn't produce a full patch using cvs diff -c this time since I have
> > > created new files and anonymous cvs usage doesn't allow you to
> > > adds. I'm supplying the modified src/interfaces/jdbc as a tarball at :
> > > http://www.candleweb.no/~gunnar/projects/pgsql/postgres-jdbc-2000-10-05.tgz
> >
> > Got it. Don't worry about the diff, I'll merge it in manually. At this
> > stage, it will be easier, and less prone to generating bugs with the
> > changes I've got here.
>
> Hmm. I just grabbed the latest source from CVS and it seems to be that my
> first version and not the latest one who is merged in(or maybe it was Bruce
> who did that...). Anyway the version in CVS is buggy and should be replaced
> with the version from October 5 pointed to in the mail quoted above. The
> current changes in CVS needs to be backed out one way or the other.

has to be backed out one way or another ... because ... ?