I'm very interested in a total revamp of the C++ API. I'd like to mirror
the roguewave dbtools++ api in some ways as well as building a STL
compliant interface. Would you be interested in working together on this?
On Wed, 7 Mar 2001, J. T. Vermeulen wrote:
> Is anyone maintaining libpq++? My patches are beginning to seriously
> overlap each other, making it hard to submit them individually.
> If there's nobody out there, I'd be willing to maintain this code and
> make more extensive changes. In particular, I would like to:
> - introduce exceptions instead of manual checking, as suggested in TODO;
> - update the manual;
> - review all the little consts, bools, explicits and such;
> - replace PgTransaction by a more fine-grained and exception-safe
> mechanism outside the PgDatabase hierarchy;
> - provide STL-conformant interfaces for iterating over result sets;
> - allow fields to be accessed in a type-safe manner;
> - ensure clean compilation under g++ 3.0;
> - bring functionality up-to-date with libpq if, as & where needed
> Would that be OK?
> ---------------------------(end of broadcast)---------------------------
> TIP 6: Have you searched our list archives?
Phone: (905) 271-3550
"You cannot possibly pay a philosopher what he's worth,
but try your best" -- Aristotle
In response to
- libpq++ at 2001-03-07 19:52:47 from J. T. Vermeulen
- Re: libpq++ at 2001-03-07 23:02:50 from J. T. Vermeulen
pgsql-interfaces by date
|Next:||From: Bruce Momjian||Date: 2001-03-07 21:43:29|
|Subject: Re: libpq++|
|Previous:||From: J. T. Vermeulen||Date: 2001-03-07 19:52:47|