| From: | Stephan Szabo <sszabo(at)megazone23(dot)bigpanda(dot)com> |
|---|---|
| To: | Tom Lane <tgl(at)sss(dot)pgh(dot)pa(dot)us> |
| Cc: | Alexander Klimov <ask(at)wisdom(dot)weizmann(dot)ac(dot)il>, pgsql-bugs(at)postgresql(dot)org |
| Subject: | Re: constrains of array |
| Date: | 2000-12-12 21:06:04 |
| Message-ID: | Pine.BSF.4.21.0012121305020.33222-100000@megazone23.bigpanda.com |
| Views: | Raw Message | Whole Thread | Download mbox | Resend email |
| Thread: | |
| Lists: | pgsql-bugs |
On Tue, 12 Dec 2000, Tom Lane wrote:
> Stephan Szabo <sszabo(at)megazone23(dot)bigpanda(dot)com> writes:
> >> In fact, there's a good argument that we should require the two columns
> >> to have the exact same datatype.
>
> > I think the spec only requires them to be comparable
>
> Oh, in that case never mind ... but I'd still favor checking for
> existence of the comparison operator right away.
Okay, will do. :)
| From | Date | Subject | |
|---|---|---|---|
| Next Message | Tom Lane | 2000-12-12 21:14:21 | Re: plpgsql function error after alter table add |
| Previous Message | pgsql-bugs | 2000-12-12 21:00:40 | pqReadData() -- backend closed the channel unexpectedly |