Skip site navigation (1) Skip section navigation (2)

Re: beta testing version

From: The Hermit Hacker <scrappy(at)hub(dot)org>
To: Gary MacDougall <gary(at)freeportweb(dot)com>
Cc: mlw <markw(at)mohawksoft(dot)com>, Hannu Krosing <hannu(at)tm(dot)ee>, Thomas Lockhart <lockhart(at)alumni(dot)caltech(dot)edu>, Don Baccus <dhogaza(at)pacifier(dot)com>, PostgreSQL Development <pgsql-hackers(at)postgresql(dot)org>
Subject: Re: beta testing version
Date: 2000-12-04 00:53:08
Message-ID: Pine.BSF.4.21.0012032051560.468-100000@thelab.hub.org (view raw or flat)
Thread:
Lists: pgsql-hackers
On Sun, 3 Dec 2000, Gary MacDougall wrote:

> > If you write a program which stands on its own, takes no work from
> > uncompensated parties, then you have the unambiguous right to do what
> > ever you want.
> 
> Thats a given.

okay, then now I'm confused ... neither SePICK or erServer are derived
from uncompensated parties ... they work over top of PgSQL, but are not
integrated into them, nor have required any changes to PgSQL in order to
make it work ...

... so, where is this whole outcry coming from?



In response to

Responses

pgsql-hackers by date

Next:From: The Hermit HackerDate: 2000-12-04 01:03:54
Subject: Re: beta testing version
Previous:From: The Hermit HackerDate: 2000-12-04 00:50:24
Subject: Re: beta testing version

Privacy Policy | About PostgreSQL
Copyright © 1996-2014 The PostgreSQL Global Development Group