Skip site navigation (1) Skip section navigation (2)

Re: pg_trigger and tgargs

From: Stephan Szabo <sszabo(at)megazone23(dot)bigpanda(dot)com>
To: Michael Fork <mfork(at)toledolink(dot)com>
Cc: pgsql-hackers(at)postgresql(dot)org
Subject: Re: pg_trigger and tgargs
Date: 2000-11-30 23:39:04
Message-ID: Pine.BSF.4.21.0011301536050.48480-100000@megazone23.bigpanda.com (view raw or flat)
Thread:
Lists: pgsql-hackers
On Thu, 30 Nov 2000, Michael Fork wrote:

> I was wondering if someone could tell me if I have gotten the fields of
> tgargs correct:
For foreign key constraints, yes.  Other triggers can use tgargs for
whatever they want.
 
> <unnamed>\000 -- Constraint name?
Yes.

> foreign_table_multi\000 -- table with foreign key(s)
> primary_table_multi\000 -- table with primary key(s)
Yep.
 
> UNSPECIFIED\000         -- ??
What match type was specified (or unspecified if none was specified).

> foreign_int_1\000       -- 1st field in foreign key
> 
> primary_int_1\000       -- 1st field in referenced primary key
> 
> foreign_int_2\000       -- 1st field in foreign key 
> primary_int_2\000       -- 1st field in referenced primary key
2nd on the latter two, but yes in general


In response to

pgsql-hackers by date

Next:From: The Hermit HackerDate: 2000-11-30 23:47:08
Subject: Re: beta testing version
Previous:From: Nathan MyersDate: 2000-11-30 23:35:59
Subject: Re: beta testing version

Privacy Policy | About PostgreSQL
Copyright © 1996-2014 The PostgreSQL Global Development Group