On Tue, 28 Nov 2000, Don Baccus wrote:
> At 03:25 PM 11/28/00 -0700, Ron Chmara wrote:
> >Mitch Vincent wrote:
> >> This is one of the not-so-stomped boxes running PostgreSQL -- I've never
> >> restarted PostgreSQL on it since it was installed.
> >> 12:03pm up 122 days, 7:54, 1 user, load average: 0.08, 0.11, 0.09
> >> I had some index corruption problems in 6.5.3 but since 7.0.X I haven't
> >> heard so much as a peep from any PostgreSQL backend. It's superbly stable on
> >> all my machines..
> >I have a 6.5.x box at 328 days of active use.
> >Crash "recovery" seems silly to me. :-)
> Well, not really ... but since our troll is a devoted MySQL user, it's a bit
> of a red-herring anyway, at least as regards his own server.
> You know, the one he's afraid to put Postgres on, but sleeps soundly at
> night knowing the mighty bullet-proof MySQL with its full transaction
> semantics, archive logging and recovery from REDO logs and all that
> will save him? :)
> Again ... he's a troll, not even a very entertaining one.
In response to
pgsql-hackers by date
|Next:||From: Tom Lane||Date: 2000-11-29 00:16:28|
|Subject: F_SETLK is looking worse and worse...|
|Previous:||From: Don Baccus||Date: 2000-11-28 22:58:12|
|Subject: Re: beta testing version|