Skip site navigation (1) Skip section navigation (2)

Re: beta testing version

From: The Hermit Hacker <scrappy(at)hub(dot)org>
To: Don Baccus <dhogaza(at)pacifier(dot)com>
Cc: Ron Chmara <ron(at)opus1(dot)com>, Mitch Vincent <mitch(at)venux(dot)net>, "pgsql-hackers(at)postgresql(dot)org" <pgsql-hackers(at)postgresql(dot)org>
Subject: Re: beta testing version
Date: 2000-11-28 23:10:58
Message-ID: Pine.BSF.4.21.0011281910480.323-100000@thelab.hub.org (view raw or flat)
Thread:
Lists: pgsql-hackers
On Tue, 28 Nov 2000, Don Baccus wrote:

> At 03:25 PM 11/28/00 -0700, Ron Chmara wrote:
> >Mitch Vincent wrote:
> >> 
> >> This is one of the not-so-stomped boxes running PostgreSQL -- I've never
> >> restarted PostgreSQL on it since it was installed.
> >> 12:03pm  up 122 days,  7:54,  1 user,  load average: 0.08, 0.11, 0.09
> >> I had some index corruption problems in 6.5.3 but since 7.0.X I haven't
> >> heard so much as a peep from any PostgreSQL backend. It's superbly stable on
> >> all my machines..
> >
> >I have a 6.5.x box at 328 days of active use.
> >
> >Crash "recovery" seems silly to me. :-)
> 
> Well, not really ... but since our troll is a devoted MySQL user, it's a bit
> of a red-herring anyway, at least as regards his own server.
> 
> You know, the one he's afraid to put Postgres on, but sleeps soundly at
> night knowing the mighty bullet-proof MySQL with its full transaction
> semantics, archive logging and recovery from REDO logs and all that
> will save him? :)
> 
> Again ... he's a troll, not even a very entertaining one.

Or informed?



In response to

pgsql-hackers by date

Next:From: Tom LaneDate: 2000-11-29 00:16:28
Subject: F_SETLK is looking worse and worse...
Previous:From: Don BaccusDate: 2000-11-28 22:58:12
Subject: Re: beta testing version

Privacy Policy | About PostgreSQL
Copyright © 1996-2014 The PostgreSQL Global Development Group