| From: | The Hermit Hacker <scrappy(at)hub(dot)org> |
|---|---|
| To: | Jan Wieck <JanWieck(at)Yahoo(dot)com> |
| Cc: | PostgreSQL HACKERS <pgsql-hackers(at)postgresql(dot)org> |
| Subject: | Re: Article on MySQL vs. Postgres |
| Date: | 2000-07-05 03:19:45 |
| Message-ID: | Pine.BSF.4.21.0007050018020.33627-100000@thelab.hub.org |
| Views: | Raw Message | Whole Thread | Download mbox | Resend email |
| Thread: | |
| Lists: | pgsql-hackers |
> Final notes:
>
> I hate these "MySQL" vs. "PostgreSQL" articles that want to
> say "this one is the better". Each one has it's advantages
> and disadvantages. Both have a long TODO.
Also, none of the 'comparisons' take the time to deal with the fact that
ones "disadvantages" can generally be overcome using its
"advantages" (ie. speed issues with PostgreSQL can generally be overcome
by making use of its high end features (ie. subselects)) ...
| From | Date | Subject | |
|---|---|---|---|
| Next Message | The Hermit Hacker | 2000-07-05 03:28:36 | Re: Article on MySQL vs. Postgres |
| Previous Message | Bruce Momjian | 2000-07-05 02:54:36 | Re: [COMMITTERS] pgsql/doc/TODO.detail (alpha default distinct flock fsync function limit null pg_shadow primary) |