Re: OK, OK, Hiroshi's right: use a seperately-generated filename

From: The Hermit Hacker <scrappy(at)hub(dot)org>
To: Tom Lane <tgl(at)sss(dot)pgh(dot)pa(dot)us>
Cc: Chris Bitmead <chris(at)bitmead(dot)com>, pgsql-hackers(at)postgresql(dot)org
Subject: Re: OK, OK, Hiroshi's right: use a seperately-generated filename
Date: 2000-06-20 22:50:34
Message-ID: Pine.BSF.4.21.0006201949570.1098-100000@thelab.hub.org
Views: Raw Message | Whole Thread | Download mbox | Resend email
Thread:
Lists: pgsql-hackers

On Fri, 16 Jun 2000, Tom Lane wrote:

> Chris Bitmead <chris(at)bitmead(dot)com> writes:
> > At least on UNIX, couldn't you use a hard-link and change the name in
> > pg_class immediately? Let the brain-dead operating systems use the
> > vacuum method.
>
> Hmm ... maybe, but it doesn't seem worth the portability headache to
> me. We do have an NT port that we don't want to break, and I don't
> think RENAME TABLE is worth the trouble of testing/supporting two
> implementations.
>
> Even on Unix, aren't there filesystems that don't do hard links?
> Not that I'd recommend running Postgres on such a volume, but...

tTo the best of my knowledge, its only symlinks that aren't
(weren't?) universally supported ... somehow, I believe taht even extends
to NT ...

In response to

Browse pgsql-hackers by date

  From Date Subject
Next Message Ryan Kirkpatrick 2000-06-20 23:15:25 Re: [HACKERS] Re: Call for port testing on fmgr changes -- Results!
Previous Message Hiroshi Inoue 2000-06-20 20:59:41 RE: Big 7.1 open items