Skip site navigation (1) Skip section navigation (2)

RE: [HACKERS] Rate your Database ...

From: "Marc G(dot) Fournier" <scrappy(at)hub(dot)org>
To: Don Baccus <dhogaza(at)pacifier(dot)com>
Cc: Peter Mount <petermount(at)it(dot)maidstone(dot)gov(dot)uk>, pgsql-announce(at)postgreSQL(dot)org, pgsql-hackers(at)postgreSQL(dot)org
Subject: RE: [HACKERS] Rate your Database ...
Date: 2000-04-17 13:58:17
Message-ID: Pine.BSF.4.21.0004170957570.60442-100000@hub.org (view raw or flat)
Thread:
Lists: pgsql-announce
On Mon, 17 Apr 2000, Don Baccus wrote:

> At 07:42 AM 4/17/00 +0100, Peter Mount wrote:
> >Interesting that we have the most number of people rating us compared
> >with everyone else...
> 
> It's also interesting that PostgreSQL's "Replication Ability" scores
> a 2.3 when there's zero support for replication.

*rofl*  I never even noticed that one ... okay, so we have a couple of
uninformed zealots :)



In response to

pgsql-announce by date

Next:From: Marc G. FournierDate: 2000-04-17 14:06:54
Subject: Re: [HACKERS] PostgreSQL v7.0 - Release Candidate 1
Previous:From: Marc G. FournierDate: 2000-04-17 13:54:43
Subject: PostgreSQL v7.0 - Release Candidate 1

Privacy Policy | About PostgreSQL
Copyright © 1996-2014 The PostgreSQL Global Development Group